Ken Dobson's Queer Ruminations from Thailand
Search this site
  • Life in Thailand
  • Queer Issues in Thailand
  • Queer Christian Issues
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Stories

Dead

9/26/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
                          THERE IS NO VERIFIABLE CASE FOR LIFE AFTER DEATH
 
I was disgusted this week to read that a conservative Christian theology teacher in the USA had posted online, “I morn for Ruth Bader Ginsburg. A Jew called by HIS name who did not receive her KING. She is in ETERNAL torment. ‘Rest in peace’ she will not be doing. … This is a hard core fact. There is NO other way to enter heaven but by Jesus Christ.”  She went on, “…she will burn in hell for the sin of rejecting Jesus.”

I was shocked into reconsidering two questions: (1) what has happened to Christian theology?  (2) Is it respectful to admit that Justice Ginsburg’s physical life has ended?

Every religion insists there is life after death.  Sometimes the argument is based on testimony from those who have experienced “near death.”  A previous generation was fascinated with the new science of parapsychology about messages from beyond.  Before the Age of Enlightenment the declarations of Christian theologians and of authorities on the Bible were sufficient.  Something about us is still alive after we die – that is the nearly universal testimony of the most profound thinkers in history and of the wisdom keepers of every ethnic community ever studied.

So, it is with considerable care that I propose one of several arguments that when we die we stay dead forever.  The purpose of this is to consider its potential effect on theology and religion because I contend that it need not be the ultimate purpose of religion to prove we are immortal.

If CONSCIOUSNESS IS AN ELECTRO-CHEMICAL PROCESS consciousness ends when our electro-chemical processes end.  That is, consciousness has no independent existence.

All contemporary world religions postulate that something goes on after a person dies.  This “thing” is usually called a soul.  Twentieth century theologians began to identify “soul” with mind or personality.  Many contemporary religions invest this soul with a capacity to continue after death.  Based on Persian concepts, theistic religions describe realms of existence after death as heaven and hell.  In those places the deceased are conscious of their past actions and understand their present states are a result of those deeds.  Popular Buddhist faith perpetuates vivid concepts of hell.  Popular Christian faith has largely consigned those ideas to antiquity in favor of the notion of an ongoing consciousness and ability to be reunited with predecessors in an afterlife.

These results would be impossible if all consciousness is thought, all thought is a function of brains, and brains function through electro-chemical synapses.  It is now believed that those electro-chemical sparks continue for about ten minutes after a brain ceases to receive necessary oxygen through refreshed blood supply.  First, stimulation ceases from sensory sources (sight, sound, touch, etc.).  But then all thought ends, even (as in deep dreams) that which is independent of the senses.  That is the end for a person.

If this materialistic view of human life and consciousness is true, religious views of life-after-death are false.

If there were SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR LIFE AFTER DEATH, that would, of course, settle the matter in favor of “going on.”  After all, “The human race as a whole has refused to believe that when the brain ceases to function the mind ceases to exist.”

On the whole, the argument for life after death has been along the lines “we so much want it to be so that it must be so.”  Emerson declared, “The blazing evidence of immortality is our dissatisfaction with any other solution.”

My first encounter with this discussion was about 60 years ago when I obtained a copy of You Will Survive After Death, by Dr. Sherwood Eddy.  He was probably the most internationally distinguished person in my home town at the time.  He had completed an illustrious career with the Student Volunteer Movement and the YMCA, first in South India and then throughout South Asia, the Middle East and Russia.  After he retired he lived right up the street from our house.  Toward the end of his life he compiled his scientific research about life after death.  He was clear that he meant it literally.

“When I speak of life beyond death, I mean the survival of individual, personal consciousness, with memory of the past and a personality that shall be spiritually recognizable to my friends, past and future.” [p. 3]

Eddy first argued philosophically, “Because of the testimony of science to a rational and trustworthy universe I believe I shall survive physical death.” [p. 5]  Then he turned to the “new science” of parapsychology.  One by one he summarized the “scientific” findings of scientists in this new field.  This, it turns out, was his scientific evidence.

Parapsychology, briefly, was a fad during the early twentieth century based on experiences of mental telepathy, séances involving conversations with those who have died, psychic healing, and teleportation of material objects.  This has been labeled a pseudoscience by various scientific societies after 1950, the year Eddy’s book came out.

Many other authors have written about theories explaining why it is scientifically probable that some form of life goes on, sometimes with memory of past lives and sometimes without, as when one “merges with the cosmos” or enters the body of someone just beginning life.   The end result is that none of these theories is verifiable, and they are supported largely on the assumption that due to the immense number of galaxies and universes the likelihood is there, somehow.  It is tantamount to saying “Nothing is impossible so everything is possible.” 

One does not have to believe “nothing goes on.”  Believe there is a going on if you want (as I do), or if you have experiences that convince you to believe it.  But my point is “It’s not the end of any current faith system if our physical bodies just quit.”

That brings us back to the only scientifically verifiable thing we know for sure: “When we die, our electro-chemical processes stop and the systems in which they operated begin deterioration that nothing can reverse.”

IF THIS IS THE CASE, RELIGIONS NEED TO BE DOING SOMETHING ELSE THAN PRESCRIBING CONDITIONS FOR IMMORTALITY.  There’s plenty to do.   
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Rev. Dr. Kenneth Dobson posts his weekly reflections on this blog. 

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Copyright © 2023 Rev. Dr. Kenneth Dobson