Ken Dobson's Queer Ruminations from Thailand
Search this site
  • Life in Thailand
  • Queer Issues in Thailand
  • Queer Christian Issues
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Stories

Folk Faith

7/13/2017

2 Comments

 
                                    Overlapping Realms of Faith in the USA – Essay 4
 
     American cemeteries are cultural repositories.  They remind us who we were.  We have other archives, of course, art museums and libraries, architecture and archeology, to name four.

     Late 20th century cemeteries are called such things as Memorial Lawn and the famous Forest Lawn Memorial Parks, and are clear of obtrusive tomb stones.  As with funeral homes, the custom is to cosmetize and preserve the placid memory of loved ones who have “passed on”.

     Early 20th century cemeteries have plain tombstones marking graves, engraved simply with names and dates.  In death all are equal and removed from controversy, competition and travail.  Military cemeteries epitomize this view of death.

     19th century cemeteries tended, as with much of the Gilded Age, to elaborate on grief and glory.  Those who could afford it enshrined loved ones under monuments that expressed how important they were, how desperately they would be missed and how lovingly remembered.

     Funeral arrangements and religious services evolved with the times.  Sadness, elicited or imaginary, with ritualized mourning and eloquent eulogies have given way to more subdued expressions.  Along with the idea that death is a natural and inevitable result of life, the consensus has developed that something of us goes on into the beyond.  It is a comforting (although somewhat tenuous) thought that a reunion awaits on the other side after we have shed the inconvenient aspects of this mortal body and our social aggravations, as well.
​
     From the moment of death to the final disposition of the dead body, several actions are expected, anywhere in the world:

  • The fact of death is verified.
  • The dead body is prepared.
  • Community is informed and family gathered.
  • The life of the dead person is recalled.
  • Passage out of this life is commemorated.
  • The body is consigned to decomposition or preservation.
 
     If any of these steps is impossible, the process is unsatisfactory and “closure” is incomplete.  One of the shifts in American funeral practices over the last 50 years is the gradual move away from elaborate embalming and entombment toward “natural” disposal such as planting trees with the body beneath or accelerated decomposition such as cremation. 

     Every one of these events is subject to circumstances and cultural variation.  None of them is dictated by the doctrines of any orthodox religious authority.  [“Orthodox” in this sense refers to an established religious organization such as a branch of Judaism, a Christian denomination, or a sect of Buddhism, etc.]  For example, compare how arrangements for an Anglican Episcopalian Igorot woman in mountainous Sagada, Philippines in 1945 would have differed from arrangements for American seaman in the South Pacific at about the same time, and compare those to President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s funeral on April 14, 1945 in the White House.  Only the Book of Common Prayer service might have been the same.

     In other words, funeral customs are not dictated in the same way church doctrine is.  Only the formal religious service overlaps.  The rest is part of some other set of dynamics controlled by other narratives and traditions.  Most of that is under the heading of “folk faith”.  Folk faith tells us whether close kinfolks ought to wash the body of a dead person or not, whether the body should be “consigned” in a shroud, wrapped in a cloth, or fully dressed.  Folk faith tells us whether mourners should wear certain colored clothes and how to express grief acceptably.  Almost everything that happens in an American funeral is under the umbrella of folk faith except possibly some core elements of the “life-passage commemoration” (i.e. the funeral service).  Folk faith is a faith aspect of culture. 

     There are four overlapping realms of faith in America.  They include orthodox religion, spiritual personal development regimens, American civil religion, and folk faith.  Folk faith in the United States includes a wide range of generally held beliefs and narratives about life and death, common sense, and the natural order.  Folk faith is about how to conceptualize and configure the nature of life and death in ways that integrate cognition, intuition and aspiration, and facilitate social flow.  An article of folk faith may be agreeable to everyone of a given religion or region but not be mandated by any religious authority.  Religious authority is expressed in various ways.  For Anglicans (Episcopalians) in the USA, “our way” is verbalized in the prayer book.  For Amish, the bishop has the presiding voice.  For Christian Scientists and Quakers, let your conscience be your guide.  For Roman Catholics there is an authority hierarchy with some issues directed by canon law and others by decrees or traditions.  In all cases there is an area left over where folk faith predominates.

     A second large area of American folk-faith, in addition to funeral practices and beliefs about death, is about how God operates in our lives day-to-day.  God, in this context, may be either a person or a principle.  An Internet posting a few days ago had this quote ascribed to Michael Horton (whitehorseinn.org): “Our American gospel has become a gospel of following your dreams and being good so God will make your dreams come true.”  There are lots of variations of this including expressions such as “God is in the driver’s seat,” and “Believe in hope, blessings are coming.”  “Be patient,” one message advises, “God is sending help to mend all broken areas of your life.”  The new American gospel may not have anything to do with God at all.  What happens to you may be the result of karma; rewards and punishments are essentially deserved, although there may be an element of luck.  Then there is prosperity theology that prescribes wealth as the product of strong faith and faithful obedience.

     Another way to consider folk faith is as a cultural over-lay.  It may be difficult to separate folk faith from the beliefs of an orthodox religion, but there are clues.  Orthodox religions tend to be largely the same from one cultural context to the next.  Calvinism is not much different in Korea or Scotland.  Folk faith beliefs and practices vary from culture to culture.  Folk faith tends to be more fluid and prone to fads and fanaticism.  Folk faith may be, and often is, in service to other ends than human nature and destiny.  For instance, the notion that menstruating women desecrate a sacred space effectively prevents women from equal status, thus preserving male privilege.  Circumcision of boys, similarly, not only designates the boys as members of the tribe but also insures that only boys and their consorts and families have that designation.  Folk faith may also have dual or multiple objectives, as in the case of the issue of abortion.  As a principle in Roman Catholicism abortion and artificial birth control methods are prohibited because they are in contravention of the divine purpose for human sexuality which is exclusively for human reproduction.  Anti-abortion colleagues who are not Roman Catholic may consider abortion wrong because they have agreed with the very recent argument (since the 1970s) that abortion is murder, whereas other forms of birth control are not.  That there is a diverse rationale for the same moral injunction is a sign that the issue in question is a matter of folk faith in a cultural context.

     It is with regard to morality that folk faith can turn abusive.  Whereas religious organizations recognize that their authority extends only to those who are members and adherents, folk faith tends to expand moral codes to everyone within a geographical area.  This tendency is historically potent in the USA.  Three examples come to mind.  (1) When the Church of Jesus Christ, Latter Day Saints (Mormons) began, polygamy was reintroduced as a precept of the new religion.  This, more than any other issue, incited outrage and led to persecution that drove the Mormons to Utah.  (2) When colonial settlers moved into territory held sacred by native people, the taboos and practices particular to those holy precincts were over-ridden and ignored.  This, more than any other issue, led to the genocidal Indian Wars of the 1870s.  (3) When slaves were captured in Africa and transported to the Americas, the White Christian moral code was abrogated to permit slave owners to nullify slave families, breed slaves like animals, and of course to buy and sell them, all of which were prohibited with regard to free white Christians.
​
     Finally, in folk faith, moral and cultural issues assume priority importance.  In orthodox religion the main items of faith are metaphysical with ethics and ritual derived from that.  There tend to be partisans, often fervent and aggressive, to particular issues in folk faith, but no outstanding leaders.  Folk faith is derived from common-sense, widely-held beliefs that “everyone ought to agree to.”  By its very inclusive nature and assumptions, orthodox religionists usually also agree with the issues.  Because of their overlap most Americans do not bother to differentiate between one realm of faith and another and therein lays injustice, misunderstanding, and trouble.
 
[Expect the next article on “Overlapping Realms of Faith in the USA” on “Spirituality” in August.  Previous articles in this series are: essay 1 www.kendobson.asia/blog/overlapping-realms-of-faith, essay 2 www.kendobson.asia/blog/american-civil-religion, and essay 3 www.kendobson.asia/blog/a-religion] 
2 Comments
Paul Frazier
7/14/2017 11:17:23 pm

Many thanks for a helpful essay.
The old saying, “if you want to know the culture of the area, go to the funerals” can be a help.
It is bitter truth that yes, a lot of folks expect God to “make all your unfulfilled dreams come true in Heaven.”
In this rural western Illinois village where I live, most of the funerals I’ve conducted were for non-churchgoing folks who have a nebulous idea of what they believe.
In fact, I have not even met most of the people who are being buried.
Their musical expressions have been country music or the four old traditional hymns, How Great Thou Art, Amazing Grace, the Old Rugged Cross, In the Garden. I refer to those as “Jesus and Me and Mostly Me” kind of hymns.
Combined with those songs is the expectation that Psalm 23 and John 14 be read.
Preachers are expected to preach the deceased into Heaven, and cement the nebulous “religious” feelings into something warm and sentimental.
It cannot be done in 15 to 20 minutes.
The dirt from the grave is covered with Astroturf, and plastic flower arrangements decorate the neighboring graves.
When I throw dirt on the casket, reciting the traditional words, “we commit (Name) to the ground; ashes to ashes, dust to dust, in sure and certain hope to Resurrection, through Jesus Christ our Lord” those words probably are not Good News, but a jolt to see dirt on the casket.
My heart is sad and heavy for many of these good people. They are my neighbors. I can only pray that God does comfort them in their grief and that their neighbors are a good and present help in their grief.

Reply
Kenneth Chester Dobson
7/15/2017 06:07:46 am

It is also true that a funeral is for the living. The subject may be the one who died, but the matter at hand is how to help the survivors close this chapter of their lives and move forward. That, too, is almost impossible in 15 or 20 minutes, but it sometimes happens if the pastor taps the right bricks to open the doorway into the unseen. As for recognizing the beckoning presence of Jesus Christ beyond that doorway, that recognition is cumulative leading to an "I know you." Maybe a glimpse of dirt on the casket and a refrain of "The Old Rugged Cross" will do it. It's not entirely up to us preachers. It's really not.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Rev. Dr. Kenneth Dobson posts his weekly reflections on this blog. 

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Copyright © 2023 Rev. Dr. Kenneth Dobson