Ken Dobson's Queer Ruminations from Thailand
Search this site
  • Life in Thailand
  • Queer Issues in Thailand
  • Queer Christian Issues
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Stories

Lingam

11/1/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Perhaps the most misunderstood major religious symbol is the Shiva-lingam.  It is prominent in Thai Buddhist architecture, which is the reason I am devoting this essay to it.  It is also a very fine example of how the realms of discourse about faith overlap here in Thailand. 

First, what is the Shiva-lingam?  In Hindu symbolism the lingam usually looks like a short post that is either round or octagonal, but sometimes square with a round top.  It refers to the energy and potential of God.  It alludes to power and creativity.  But it is indivisible from the female counterpart represented as the Yoni.  They are similar, then, to the Yin and Yang of Northern Asian religions. Recent Hindu theologians have objected to the very idea that the Shiva-lingam is a phallic symbol.  They insist that the idea was developed at a time when Buddhism was predominant, and it was reinforced by the British who despised all things Hindu, and especially the Shiva-lingam. In Thailand nine Shiva-linga are used as boundary markers around a bot (ordination chapel) in a Buddhist temple.  The ninth stone is actually buried in the very center of the chapel as its foundation stone.  City pillars are also in the form of Shiva-lingam.  Scholars indicate that the city pillars of North Thailand were a tradition inherited from Tai cultural roots that pre-date Khmer influence which was Hindu.  

So, there seems to be a separate strain of faith.  What is it?  

Clearly, it is a fertility symbol.  To this day there are examples of phallic symbols scattered throughout Thai folklore and practice.  For the most part there is no use denying that the symbol is a penis, sometimes grotesque and sometimes very realistic.  It would be convenient to sanitize these as crude forms of Shiva-linga, but I cannot accept that interpretation.  The symbol, called in Thai palad khik, is a power-attracting charm or talisman.  The folklore regarding palad khik carries all the marks of supernaturalism with a heritage that goes back to early animism (the pantheistic belief that all things in nature had spirits worthy of reverence).  The main characteristic of modern supernaturalism is its ambiguity.  So also with palad khik.  They are sometimes used as fertility symbols, sometimes as protective symbols (especially against drowning), or to restore energy to resist the spiritual aspects of disease and misfortune.  A man may wear a little carved penis image on a cord around his waist, keeping it away from his real thing, to deceive demons and add to a man’s strength and resistance.  Parents might put one around a baby’s waist to persuade the demon that the vulnerable child is really a full-fledged adult.  A woman might purchase a palad khik and offer it at a shrine where these are collected, to encourage a wanted pregnancy.  Philip Cornwel-Smith has an excellent article on this in Very Thai: Everyday Popular Culture with excellent pictures by John Goss [Bangkok: River Books, 2005].

If Siva-linga and Thai palad khik have anything in common it is a shared reference to creative energy and perhaps a heritage from religious culture that predates Vedic Hinduism.  But the symbols should not be confused.  The most potent palad khik are invested with power through chants that few know how to do these days.  Mistreating a palad khik, or misrepresenting one by subjecting it to ridicule, can easily create hard feelings and strong reactions.  But mis-handling or scorning a Shiva-linga can be considered in the same light as demeaning a Buddha image or a Christian crucifix; it would be a crime under Thai law.

Finally, I admit that not all people in Thailand agree with this distinction I have made.  Most Thai people accept the Buddhist notion that Shiva-linga are phallic symbols as are palad khik.  A controversy in Krabi Province reported on Oct 24, 2014 by Thai InfoNet conflates Shiva symbols with phallic symbols.  Most Thai Christians have inherited the missionary bias that all these sexual referents are demeaning and wrong while refusing to recognize the same idea in tall church steeples.  Most young men want nothing to do with the mockery that would come from being found to have a penis image tied around their waists or tattooed on their bodies.  Most modern Thai people think of the whole subject as at least a little dirty.  One has to be a bit desperate to have anything to do with this questionable aspect of spiritualism.  Cornwel-Smith thinks the veneration of palad khik will pass away in a few years.  I have doubts about that.  This symbol in one form or another is one of the oldest and 
most enduring.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Rev. Dr. Kenneth Dobson posts his weekly reflections on this blog. 

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Copyright © 2023 Rev. Dr. Kenneth Dobson